UBC News

Ontario Property Division: Why Married vs Common-Law Couples Are Often Surprised

Episode Summary

Ontario's property laws create a shocking divide between married and common-law couples that most partners never see coming. One relationship type offers automatic protection while the other leaves contributors with nothing, regardless of years invested or sacrifices made. Click here to learn more.

Episode Notes

You know what's wild? Right now, there are thousands of couples in Ontario who think they're building a life together, splitting mortgage payments, raising kids, making joint decisions about everything from paint colors to retirement plans. They've been together for five years, maybe ten, maybe even longer. And they honestly believe that because they've lived together all this time, the law sees them the same way it sees married couples. They're wrong. And that mistake is going to cost some of them everything they've worked for. Here's the thing nobody tells you until it's too late. In Ontario, marriage isn't just a piece of paper or a nice ceremony or a way to make your grandmother happy. Marriage is a legal switch that completely changes how property gets divided when relationships end. And common law? Despite what most people think, it's nowhere close to the same thing. Let me break this down because it matters way more than you realize. When you get married in Ontario, you're entering what the law calls an economic partnership. That means from your wedding day forward, you're both entitled to share equally in the value of everything accumulated during the marriage. Notice I said the value, not the actual stuff. This trips people up constantly. You don't get half of every individual thing. Instead, the system balances out what each person gained financially during the marriage through something called an equalization payment. Here's how it works. Each spouse adds up everything they own on the day they separate, subtracts their debts, then subtracts what they owned on their wedding day. The difference is their net family property. Whoever ended up with more pays the other person half the difference. The goal is to put both people in an equal financial position after the marriage ends. And here's what really surprises people about marriage. Even if the house was yours before you got married, even if you inherited it from your grandmother, even if someone gifted it to you, if it became the family home, both spouses share its full value equally. The family home gets treated completely differently from every other asset under Ontario law. This protection only applies to where you actually live, not vacation properties or rental units, but for that main family home, ownership before marriage means nothing. Now let's talk about common law relationships, because this is where things get harsh. Ontario's Family Law Act that governs all those marriage property rules? It doesn't apply to common law couples at all. Doesn't matter if you've been together three years or thirty years. Doesn't matter if you have kids together. Doesn't matter if you built a business together or if one of you stayed home while the other worked. When it comes to property division, the law treats common law partners more like roommates than spouses. Property belongs to whoever's name is on the title. That's it. If your name is on the house deed, you own the house. If your partner's name is on the car registration, they own the car. And the person whose name isn't on those documents has no automatic right to claim anything, even if they contributed money toward the purchase or made payments for years. Think about what this means in real situations. Someone spends a decade helping their partner build a successful business. They handle the books, they work long hours without pay, they sacrifice their own career opportunities. The business takes off and becomes worth serious money. Then the relationship ends. Because the business is only in one partner's name, the other person walks away with nothing unless they can prove a complex legal claim in court. And those court claims are brutal. Common law partners have to prove something called unjust enrichment or constructive trust. You need extensive documentation showing exactly what you contributed and how it increased the property's value. You need to prove your ex-partner benefited unfairly at your expense. These cases often take years and cost tens of thousands in legal fees, with no guarantee you'll win. Canadian courts did create something called the joint family venture concept to help in certain situations. But even then, you have to prove you pooled resources, made joint decisions for the family's benefit, worked collaboratively toward common goals, and presented yourselves publicly as a couple. Now here's the one area where things are actually similar. Spousal support after separation follows basically the same rules whether you're married or common law. Courts look at relationship length, each person's role during the relationship, financial needs after separation, and the ability to pay. So support payments work consistently, even though property division is completely different. This is why cohabitation agreements matter so much for unmarried couples. These contracts let you establish clear rules about who owns what and how property gets divided if things end. You can specify how jointly acquired property gets handled, whether spousal support will be paid, and basically create the protections that married couples get automatically, but common law partners don't. Both partners need to sign in front of a witness, and you should both get independent legal advice before signing. Full honesty about assets and debts is essential because hiding financial information can invalidate the whole agreement. Here's something else that catches people off guard. Courts impose strict deadlines for property claims. Married spouses have six years from separation, two years after divorce becomes final, or six months after death to file equalization claims. Miss those deadlines and you lose your rights completely, even if significant money is involved. The bottom line is this. Choosing between marriage and common law isn't just about personal preference or religious beliefs. It's a decision with massive financial consequences that determines what happens to property you've spent years or decades accumulating together. Understanding these differences before you need them protects both partners and prevents devastating losses. Click on the link in the description to learn more about protecting your property rights in relationships.

Pace Law Firm
City: Toronto
Address: 191 The West Mall
Website: https://pacelawfirm.com